Josh,
There are many reasons why the Syrian regime could have been complicit!
But let us start with some definitions.
Syrian regime: the very small circle around Bashar El-Assad. The comments of the Syrian embassy in
Complicit: took a deliberate decision not to derail or undermine the effectiveness of the raid. I assume here that the raid was effective.
What could be the motives for the complicity of the Syrian regime ?
1) Internal struggle within the security forces. By allowing the
2) The murder of Brigadier General Muhammad Suleiman, and/or that of Mugniyhe, can be seen through the same lens, notwithstanding who actually pulled the trigger/pushed the button: i.e. purging of security officials or terrorists who had become too cumbersome.
What are the indications that the Syrian Regime was complicit?
1) the speed at which Syrian media were allowed to broadcast on the event was absolutely stunning. And unprecedented, when
2) The Syrian regime while intent on earning some media dividends, has conspicuously refrained from raising the stakes. Why do they not try to push for a UNSC resolution? Full knowing that it would fail, it would certainly give the regime an extra card to negotiate with the new
In sum,
No comments:
Post a Comment